Wanderings

Author Archive: joe

One Of Four Tough Action Words

Honor. That's it! Peter is not the first one to use this word, but here in First Peter chapter 2, it follows another tough word, "submit". Finding a definition for honor that people will understand is not easy. It probably wasn't that hard in Peters day (~A.D. 60), but it still probably stuck in somebody's craw.

It kind of goes with "respect", which could be another of those four words. However, I am sort of combining honor and respect as one and the same. If you disagree, click on "Contact Me" to the right and let me hear from you. Mind you, this is not a normal blog where you can add your comments, but if you have something to say, it could appear here. You will be respected for your comment, good or bad, "yea" or "nay".

Back to "honor". Having told us in verse 13 to "submit" to the govermental authorities, he doesn't leave us much wiggle room. The thing that I have found here in First Peter, and in Romans doesn't leave us the option to "feel" like letting them rule, or their "deserving" our honor or respect. Even Jesus in John 19 says that Pilate "has authority because it is given from above."[more]

And then don't forget when Jesus said "Render (give) unto Caesar what is Caesar's." It was not prefaced with "If you feel like it" or "If you think he deserves it", it was a simple "do it" kind of like you are supposed to.

What strikes me about Peter are the three words in verse 17 – honor, love and fear. To me, these are the three of the hardest words in the Bible. "Honoring all people" is an exceedingly difficult thing to do, let alone try to do. Maybe this has more to do with humility than we want to give it credit. After all, honor is that characteristic of thinking more of others – putting them ahead.

What do you think? What's it mean to you to "honor all people?" How hard is it to envision that, and then, how hard is it to do? What if you or I don't feel like honoring them. Maybe we make it too difficult by trying to make it fit our reasoning when that is not what we are told to do. If you want to go back to the original greek, there is no being asked – by Jesus, Peter or Paul. They don't beg us to do this, nor do they seem to give us an option. The only option I see and hear is "do."

Now the question is "how/what am I doing?"

Stimulas Ripoff!

Having watched my 401(k) drift off the side of the money cliff, I had hopes that our new President and his Democrat friends would try to make some difference. Not going to happen!

Got a report on what is in the new $1.7 trillion (with interest) Stimulus Package, and we all need to be worried. Search for it on the web so you can see for yourself, but here are some of the "don't make any sense" items:
[html]<ul>
<li>$400 million for research on global warming. What happened to the regular federal budget, and how many "regular people" will that put back to work?
<li>$2.4 billion for projects to demonstrate how carbon greenhouse gas can be safely removed from the atmosphere. Again, how many "regular people" (blue collar) will that put back to work?[more]
<li>$650 million for coupons to help consumers convert their TV sets from analog to digital, part of the digital TV conversion. If you are working, you can afford to get your own $40 coupon (already funded), or if not, keep sitting on your backside while those other people get your jobs – after all, you were not an environmental scientist, so you definitely can't take one of those jobs.
<li>$75 million to fund programs to help people quit smoking. This is a little ridiculous, given that many states have health care programs for children that use the taxes from the sale of tobacco products. If we fund "stop smoking programs", where will the money come from for the health care?
<li>$21 million to re-sod the National Mall, which suffered heavy use during the Inauguration. My guess is that if you got 10 people to work for 2 months (8 weeks) at $1000 a week, that would be $80,000, then double it for benefits and Social Security. You are now at $160,000. Throw in $100,000 for rental of equipment to dig up the old lawn and $100,000 for seed. Give them 3 weeks to dig up the old lawn, roto-till it and reseed. Since the sprinklers are already there, just reuse the existing watering system. Throw in another $100,000 for "just in case", and you have a total of $460,000. Round it off to $500,000, and we just saved ourselves $20.5 million. Better yet, let the prisoners from Gitmo come up and do the work while they eat everyday in the Congressional Cafeteria and sleep in mobile homes set up on the streets around the Mall.
<li>$4.19 billion to stave off foreclosures via the Neighborhood Stabilization Program. This section allows nonprofits to compete with cities and states for parts of the money. Why should anyone have to compete? Let's just tell the banks to not foreclose, and then figure out how to spend the money. Why make it so bureaucratic? Besides, what non-profits are in the mortgage lending business, and if they are going to help, why not have a working program going first?
<li>$600 million to buy a new fleet of cars for federal employees and government departments. Sure fire way to give a boost to the auto industry, but this will only get cars off the dealer's lots. Course, that's helping them to pay their bills and keep their employees busy getting the cars delivered. How about something about letting car dealers service those government vehicles – now that's recurring income.
</ul>[/html]
There is some mention that this package will require 32 new government departments, and based on at least 4 regional offices and 50 employees per office, you have over $600 million a year in pay and benefits (at $1000 per week). Knowing the way government works, there will probably be more offices and more employees. So…$300 million back into the economy. Maybe that's how they will make it work.

Peter, Paul and Echo

Reading what Peter has to say about how the church (believers) should respond to the government in First Peter chapter 2. What struck me was how similar he sounded to Paul in Romans 13. Sure enough, it was like an echo. Here were two of the biggest men in early Christiandom, and they were echoing one another.

Remember, Peter was the guy who thought Paul should not be trusted. And Paul was the guy who, early on, wanted to eliminate those pesky followers of Jesus, like Peter. Yet, here they are sounding like twin brothers – each with the same vision for how the believers were to treat government officials.

I found though that they are both consistent – "live your life so that they may see your goodness (the way you live) and by doing that silence the ignorance of foolish men."

It's how you live that speaks, not your words! It's "doing right" that says it all!